When are 'good' citizens actually good citizens?

4.11.12


Although laws try to allocate and designate to people their entitlements and responsibilities as citizens, it is the informal power structures in society that dictate the substantiveness of their citizenship. Unlike the human rights regime, attaching the concept of ‘rights’ to ‘citizenship’ emphasises that accessing one’s rights is inescapably situated in a time and place. Acknowledging this fact gives weight to observations that point out that, although individuals might have the same legal status, some seem to be getting more out of their membership than others.

Some of these arguments, to me, are clear-cut. I noted in my previous blog post, for instance, how homosexuals effectively have fewer rights to public and work spaces as they are peer-pressured out of fully expressing themselves. Cases of sexual and racial discrimination are also examples of social power relations affect access to citizenship rights. Imbalances in socio-economic status create similar results. Think of how those without private property are not given the same opportunity to vote or apply for and receive welfare; of how poorer Americans essentially have fewer rights to quality healthcare as they are deterred by the exorbitant costs of health insurance in the States.

The result of these phenomena is an effectively tiered system of citizenship. The ‘good’ citizens are those who are self-sufficient; don’t sponge off taxpayers for welfare benefits; can afford to own smartphones and notify their local councils of graffiti and potholes. The ‘lesser’ citizens are the ones who don’t uphold these standards. Although all groups in society should have the same amount of rights as citizens, in practice this simply isn’t the case. I fully understand this critique and like I wrote above, for the most part, I’m right on board. However, when I read Josée Johnston applying the framework to the issue of consumer-citizenship in her article ‘The citizen-consumer hybrid: ideological tensions and the case of Whole Foods Market’ I didn’t exactly agree.

Johnston stresses the negative social impact of organic(-promoting) supermarkets like Whole Food Market (WFM), namely, the way they “legitimise the inequalities of capitalist markets by validating elite food consumption as ethical, natural, and part of good ‘taste’” (Johnston 2007, 257). That is, how they normalise class stratification. I agree with Johnston’s point in that I do not consider a situation where groups feel entitled to more rights through a perception that they contribute more positively to society to be desirable. The question I raise, though, is how can the economy possibly be changed for the better by consumer habits if ideas like shopping organic, local, and fair-traded are not regarded as ideals?

Johnston points out that WFM flagrantly promotes a culture of consumerism and leaves consumer-citizenship opportunities purely up to choice. Perhaps Johnston’s problem is that the so-called ‘good’ citizens that shop at WFM are simply not being as ‘good’ as they like to think they are, or do it only to feel ‘good’ about themselves. If WFM did what it says it does – give citizens the opportunity to change society by voting with their dollars – I wonder if Johnston would have been okay with it contributing to society’s class divides.

The problem is organic/local/fair-trade or ‘green’/sustainable consumption seems far away from having the social or political clout it would need to make supermarkets like WFM truly embrace it. From my experience, most people don’t understand what the agenda is all about. This is illustrated perfectly by the opinions of David (not his real name), a friend of mine’s dad. David thinks organic, free-range chicken is a waste of time; that caged chicken has the same nutritional value, can be grown to be bigger, and is more efficient to produce. In his view, anyone who buys organic, free-range chicken has been duped into spending more for an imaginary improvement in taste. I think a lot of people have this view. They brand people who buy organic, free-range chicken ‘vain’, ‘hipsters’, ‘hippies’ or ‘wanky’.

What I realised the other day after watching a PBS video podcast about food miles is that the ‘organic’ tag is more than more ‘tasty’ food, it’s about the environment and climate change. A quick search on Wikipedia informed me that organic farming eliminates the use of man-made fertilisers and pesticides, which saves on the fossil fuels and resources required to produce them and improves the sustainability of the used land. The latter theoretically results in higher yields in the long-run as the land is not rendered unusable through overuse.

I realise that not everyone will buy into this argument like I have (and not everyone believes in anthropogenic climate change) but I would like to think that raising awareness of the fact that labels like ‘organic’, ‘local’ or ‘fair-trade’ is more about feeling like a ‘good’ citizen. While I find it wrong that some citizens can in effect have more rights than others due to social and economic imbalances, surely it is possible for ideals to still exist, for everyone to be on board and know what they are striving towards.

Football: Far from the beautiful game in one-party China


Timothy Siow 28.10.2012.

China prides itself on its world-class gymnasts, divers, and table tennis players, but it does not seem capable of putting together a decent team of eleven footballers. Despite having the most football fans in the world, China’s national team still languishes at 85th in the FIFA rankings.


Figure 1 Didier Drogba signs for Shanghai Shenhua

At 34, Didier Drogba can already start looking back and reflecting on his career as a professional footballer. After a rapid, albeit late, rise to prominence, the Ivorian enjoyed eight seasons at the English Premier League (EPL) club Chelsea FC where he distinguished himself as one of the EPL’s deadliest strikers, scoring 157 goals in 341 appearances (Soccernet 2012). In that time, he collected seven domestic trophies (3 Premier Leagues, 4 FA Cups and 2 League Cups) before applying the cherry on the cake, scoring the winning penalty as Chelsea claimed the coveted European Champions League trophy in May of this year (Sky Sports 2012).

Far from cooling his heels, though, by July Drogba was already undertaking a new project: helping the sleeping giant, China, develop the world-beating football players it has craved so badly for so long. At his first press conference after signing a two-and-a-half year contract with Shanghai Shenhua of the Chinese Super League (CSL), Drogba declared “I decided to come here because when the club and the president approached me, I looked at the project and it came with ambitious ideas. He wants to help football develop in China” (ESPN staff 2012).

Drogba joins fellow EPL old boys Nicolas Anelka (also of Shenhua, and with whom Drogba played during his Chelsea days) and Yakubu Aiyegbeni of Guangzhou R&F in relocating to the Far East. Marcello Lippi, who won the World Cup with Italy in 2006, is another familiar face. He is now coach of Guangzhou Evergrande, the club that broke the Chinese transfer record twice in quick succession to attain the Argentine playmaker Dario Conca and Paraguayan marksman Lucas Barrios (McGowan 2012).

The former Marseille forward claims “I didn’t come here with the idea of making a lot of money. I come here because it is a completely different challenge from what I have seen in Europe before” (ESPN staff 2012). An inescapable fact, though, is that there is a lot of money on offer in the CSL for players like Drogba, who will earn a reported US$315,000 a week (the highest in the CSL) in his two and a half years there (McGowan 2012). Without the financial incentives in the CSL, it is debatable whether or not these high-profile players would have even considered the ‘project’ (McGowan 2012).

Drogba is 100% correct in saying that improving Chinese football will be a challenge. Currently sitting at 85th place in the FIFA world rankings (FIFA 2012), the nation has only qualified for the World Cup once – the 2002 competition in Korea/Japan, which yielded no goals and no points – and has never won a game at the Olympics (The Economist 2011). Furthermore, unlike other aspects of the one-party state, Chinese football “is so flagrantly and undeniably terrible and corrupt that all potshots are allowed” (The Economist 2011). Normal citizens and the media alike openly deride the team, and a common line is that “there are two things stopping the Chinese soccer team from going outside Asia to take part in international games: their left feet and their right feet” (Wong 2008a).

What should be easier for Drogba is getting the attention of the Chinese public. The nation is much better at watching and following football than playing it, they are familiar with Europe’s biggest leagues and the world’s best players. Games at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa drew average television crowds of 17.5 million viewers in China, more than any other country (FIFA 2010). Many fans of the game in China routinely stay up late at night to watch the European games. This includes a man called Jiang Xiaoshan, who died of exhaustion after trying to watch every game of the 2012 European Championships. As the time difference meant matches were played in the middle of the night in China, the 26-year-old went 11 nights without sleep while continuing to go to work during the day (Moran 2012).

The most pertinent issue hindering the quality of Chinese football has for a long time been corruption and match-fixing scandals. In 1994, the state-run teams were opened up to corporate sponsorship and investment and the new, ‘professional’ CSL was created. The marketisation of Chinese football produced a sudden surge in the wages Chinese footballers could earn but this, of course, was not evenly distributed across the league. Clubs owned by less wealthy investors, as a result, began to fix games so their players could earn more money. Soon, “gambling syndicates, including the triads, began exerting influence over investors, referees, coaches and players” (The Economist 2011), and a regime of corruption evolved and became institutionalised into Chinese football.

This was allowed to continue unchecked as the Chinese Football Association (CFA), an arm of the single-party state, was both “deeply involved in [the] fixing [of] matches… [and] the authority charged with investigating and punishing misconduct” (The Economist 2011). Furthermore, the director of the CFA also runs the Football Management Centre, which is responsible for managing the corporate sponsorships. In other words, it is a “‘one office, two signs’ situation, which characterises much of the economic and political system” (The Editors 2010).

Corruption has been so widespread in Chinese football that in 2009, Nan Yong and Xie Yalong, two former directors of the Chinese Football Administrative Centre were found to have accepted US$190,000 worth of bribes (Century 2012) and sentenced to ten-and-a-half years’ jail (McGowan 2012). On top of this, former national team members Shen Si was given six years, and Qi Hong, Jiang Jin, and Li Ming five-and-a-half (McGowan 2012). Lu Jun, ‘the Golden Whistle’, who was previously known to be the best and cleanest referee in the country was also jailed for participating in match-fixing (Osnos 2012) and  in total, “more than 50 former players, coaches, referees and other officials have been convicted of corruption” so far (Barboza 2012). In 2001, a similar, though less extensive, bust-up of corruption in Chinese football was conducted (The Economist 2011).

The marquee signings have gone some way already to rebuilding the reputation of the CSL. With Drogba and Anelka, the average attendance of Shenhua’s games has risen from 15,000 to 25,000 (Century 2012) and across the board, “attendance is up almost 15% so far this season – the highest in Asia” (Duerden 2012). However, that Liu Jun, the general manager of Jiangsu Sainty (currently second in the table) had to deny allegations of match fixing in their recent 1-1 draw against 15th-placed Shanghai Shenxin (Tang 2012a), reminds us that there is still much to be improved on done. Put simply, the football-loving country must be encouraged to play the game, and those who do must be motivated to play it well.

The inflated wages and patronage system have long contributed to an environment that does not pressure Chinese ‘professional’ footballers to improve their game. As Evergrande’s South Korean manager Lee Jang-soo puts it, Chinese football is “mainly about connections, not hard work” (The Economist 2011). This is evident as Nan Yong once “confessed that players could buy spots on the national team for 100,000 yuan” (The Economist 2011). While observers like Ma Dexing, “the editor in chief of Titan Sports online, China’s largest sports Web portal” (Century 2012), believe expensive foreign imports like Drogba are “upping the level of the entire league because everyone is vying to be better than [them]” (Century 2012), “the best players at Evergrande, the nation’s top club, are [still] mostly foreigners earning millions of dollars a year” (The Economist 2011).

The number of Chinese youngsters playing the game has steadily declined in the past couple of decades. From 1990 to 2000 more than 600,000 teenagers in China were playing organised football but this has steadily declined. From 2000 to 2005 there were roughly 180,000 participants in this age group and today, estimates are that there are only 100,000 (The Economist 2011). An even more startling statistic is that China has “fewer than 10,000 registered under-12 players” while “Japan, the Asian champion, with a population a tenth of the size of China, has more than 300,000” (Duerden 2012).

Parents “don’t want their kids associated with something which has got such a poor record and high profile in terms of corruption”, says Simon Chadwick, a sport business strategy professor at Coventry University in England (McGowan 2012). Parents also generally consider education to be the “lone path to upward mobility” (The Economist 2011) and see sports as a distraction as China’s academic system is particularly strenuous. The most accepted measure of inequality is the Gini coefficient, where higher scores reflect higher levels inequality. China’s rose from 41.5 in 2007 to 48 in 2009 (comparable to the United States, which is known for its inequality) (CIA, date unknown), illustrating that concern over social and economic mobility is a very serious factor in the decline of participation in football in China.

Evergrande recently built a football school in partnership with Spanish giants Real Madrid in an attempt to kick-start a reinvigoration process. Placing their first-team coach Marcello Lippi in charge of the school, they anticipated that up to 3,000 students (aged 7-12) would enrol at the school in the first year and spent more than US$15.9 million scouring 65,106 primary schools around the country for prospective students. Disappointingly, only 1086 students have enrolled so far (Tang 2012b).

Additionally, the CFA “institute[d] the China School Football program in 2009 to promote grassroots football nationwide, receiving FIFA’s Development Award for doing so” (Lamb 2012; Simpson 2009). The program was sponsored by the Dalian Wanda Holdings Company, who contributed US$77 million to reach out to over a million children in 44 cities (Lamb 2012). They brought in Tom Byer, a former professional footballer held in high-esteem for his success as a youth football coach in Japan, to spearhead the program. Byer’s T3 company provides coaching services for youth players and their coaches, helps develop specific programs and curriculum for youth development, and assists in producing and providing media and training-enhancing software (Lamb 2012).

China receiving the FIFA Development Award for the School Football initiative has been derided by fans that point out that the program has only just begun and barely proven its durability or effectiveness (Simpson 2009). As Rowan Simons, a director of Club Football, points out: “It is easy to get lots of kids to play football once to meet a central target. But how many will still be involved next year?” (Simpson 2009). One other fact highlighted by Simons is that the program was spread out across 44 cities, and the total funding was “not enough to build one new football pitch in each city” (Simpson 2009).

It is not that China is uninterested in or incapable of developing world-class sportspeople and their performances at Olympic Games are evidence to this. It is that football represents a different challenge altogether. While “many of the Olympic sports are minority sports [and] it’s possible [for China] to manufacture world champions in those sports… Football is the world’s most popular game and the competition is fierce” (Associated Press 2008). The blueprint that delivers so many gold medals for China seems to be hindering their development of a world-beating football team.

Based on the ‘Soviet model’, China strives to identify potential talent early to put them through highly specialised and intensive programs as soon as possible. Long limbed children, for example, are funnelled into sports like athletics, rowing, swimming, diving or gymnastics programs while still very young.

Football, however, is less discriminatory when it comes to physical attributes. As Craig Foster, a football analyst-cum-journalist and former Socceroo, puts it, “while the physical demands of [football] are extreme, technique with the ball always prevails over physicality. Other [sports], meanwhile, have a minimum physical and athletic requirement of size and strength, rather than skill” (Foster 2009). Think of the ‘stocky’ Diego Maradona, or Lionel Messi, who required extensive and expensive treatment for a growth-hormone deficiency he was diagnosed with at age 11 (White 2009) (The Economist 2011) – they are considered two of the game’s greatest exponents.

Additionally, those who are not earmarked as potential athletes go into the education system as “regular students [who] are often explicitly forbidden from playing sports until they reach university, supposedly because it will harm their studies” (Century 2012), which effectively dashes the chances of China uncovering players in the calibre of Didier Drogba, who was not brought up in an academy system and did not start training professionally every day until he was in his late teens (McCarra 2006).

Another example is Edison Arantes do Nascimento, or as he is better known, Pelé. Pelé grew up poor on the outskirts of São Paulo in Brazil and the first games he played were with socks stuffed with newspaper or grapefruits as improvised footballs (Fish & Pelé 1977). Arguably, his raw talent, passion and will to improve, combined with an environment that encouraged experimentation were crucial in helping him become one of the most prolific-ever strikers in history.

It is clear that Drogba’s and Pelé’s are the types of narratives Chinese football is missing out on as it perseveres with its centralised training system and this is where the razzle-dazzle of the Drogbas and the Anelkas gets rendered into the background and the problems become political (Lamb 2012). The system, after all, is a product of China’s political structure.

A group of editors at the New York Times (NYT) (2010) have suggested that “perhaps the Chinese government fears that small soccer clubs could become a ‘bottom-up’ social movement that would challenge the Communist Party”. That is, if the state were to permit the formation of non-state clubs, loyalties could potentially migrate from the state’s sports bureaucracies to these clubs and networks of parents, teachers, coaches and parents-as-coaches working together could be formed (The Editors 2010). The fact is that “government-paid coaches, minders and state-of-the-art facilities all allow for great control over the training and guidance of athletes” (The Editors 2010).

Xu Guoqi, a professor of East Asian history at Kalamazoo College, warns that “if Chinese continue to be obsessed” with the Real Madrids and Manchester Uniteds of world football, they will want China to start developing world-class footballers too (Wong 2008b). He says, “they’ll definitely demand something dramatic, something political or involving rule of law [to make it happen]... It will start with sports, and then it will move onto something bigger” (Wong 2008b).

Funds are being poured into attracting established foreign talent to rid China’s domestic competition of the corruption and match-fixing of its recent past and more fans are filling up the stadiums or tuning in on their televisions. The money is even beginning to target youth development as participation has steadily fallen over the years. But stars and money can only take Chinese football so far as the population’s struggles for social and economic mobility and the shortcomings of China’s education and sports systems seem to be the real issues holding the Middle Kingdom back.

Didier Drogba says he’s serious about improving Chinese football, but his intentions will come to nothing as long as the politics remain as they are. As “a mid-level functionary in China’s state security apparatus” has put it: “You know all those problems with society that you like to blame on China’s political system? Well it really is like that with football” (The Economist 2011).


References:
Associated Press (2008), ‘English FA bans Ferguson for two games and Drogba for three; top Chinese league dropped off TV’, The New York Times, 18 November 2008, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/sports/18iht-soccernotes18.17933603.html>
Barboza, D (2012), ‘Soccer Officials Sentenced in China’, The New York Times, 13 June 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/14/sports/soccer/lengthy-prison-terms-in-chinese-soccer-corruption-case.html>
Century, A (2012), ‘In China, Drogba Draws Crowds and Controversy’, The New York Times, 5 September 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/06/sports/soccer/drogba-bringing-excitement-and-controversy-to-chinese-soccer.html?_r=0>
Duerden, J (2012), ‘Top-Heavy Investment by Soccer Clubs in China’, The New York Times, 3 May 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/sports/soccer/04iht-goal04.html?pagewanted=all>
The Economist (2011), ‘Why China fails at football: Little red card’, The Economist, 17 December 2011, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.economist.com/node/21541716>
The Editors (2010), ‘Where Are China’s Soccer Stars’, The New York Times, 29 June 2010, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/where-are-chinas-soccer-stars/#h[]>
ESPN Staff (2012), ‘Drogba: Move not about the money’, ESPN Soccernet, 14 July 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story/_/id/1124701/didier-drogba:-move-to-china-not-about-money?cc=3436>
FIFA, (2010), ‘2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa Television Audience Report’, FIFA, 2010, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/tv/01/47/31/30/keymarketsummaries.pdf>
FIFA (2012), ‘FIFA/Coca-Cola World Ranking’, FIFA, updated September 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.fifa.com/worldranking/rankingtable/index.html?intcmp=fifacom_hp_module_ranking>
Fish, RL & Pelé (1977), ‘Chapter 2’, My Life and The Beautiful Game: The Autobiography of Pelé, Doubleday & Company Inc., Garden City, New York
Foster, C (2009), ‘We’re not a handball code’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 13 September 2009, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.smh.com.au/sport/football/were-not-a-handball-code-20091125-jl0c.html>
Lamb, TJ (2012), ‘Tom Byer takes on China as Grassroots Ambassador’, Wild East Football, 9 August 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://wildeastfootball.net/2012/08/chinese-football-association-appoints-tom-byer-as-head-technical-advisor-to-china-school-football-program/>
McCarra, K (2006), ‘Rough diamond Drogba adds the polish’, The Guardian, 25 November 2006, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2006/nov/25/newsstory.sport4>
McGowan, T (2012), ‘Chinese soccer: Vanity project or emerging superpower?’, CNN, 20 June 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/20/sport/football/drogba-shanghai-shenhua-anelka-football/index.html>
Moran, L (2012), ‘Chinese football fan, 26, dies after going ELEVEN nights without sleep as he watched every single Euro 2012 match’, The Daily Mail, 22 June 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2163057/Jiang-Xiaoshan-dies-watching-Euro-2012-match-going-11-nights-sleep.html>
Osnos, E (2012), ‘Playing Fake Ball: Why Chinese Soccer Matters’, The New Yorker, 20 June 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2012/06/chinese-soccer-fixed-matches.html>
Simpson, P (2009), ‘Fans claim Fifa award for mainland “is a joke”’, South China Morning Post, 24 December 2009, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.scmp.com/article/702041/fans-claim-fifa-award-mainland-joke>
Sky Sports (2012), ‘Drogba Factfile’, Sky Sports, updated 22 May 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/12040/7772275/Drogba-factfile>
Soccernet (2012), ‘Didier Drogba’, ESPN Soccernet, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://soccernet.espn.go.com/player/_/id/18727/didier-drogba?cc=3436>
Tang, Z (2012a), ‘No fix, just a really bad game, team says’, China Daily, 21 August 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/sports/2012-08/21/content_15696108.htm>
Tang, Z (2012b), ‘Lippi the big man on campus’, China Daily, 10 October 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/sports/2012-10/10/content_15809462.htm>
White, D (2009), ‘Franck Ribery the man to challenge Lionel Messi and Barcelona’, The Telegraph, 4 April 2009, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/champions-league/5099857/Franck-Ribery-the-man-to-challenge-Lionel-Messi-and-Barcelona.html>
Wong, E (2008a), ‘China soccer: It just makes them want to kick somebody’, The New York Times, 14 August 2008, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/14/sports/14iht-OLYSOC.4.15305055.html?pagewanted=all>
Wong, E (2008b), ‘China loves its soccer. Its team? Don’t ask.’, The New York Times, 15 August 2008, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/15/sports/olympics/15soccer.html?pagewanted=all>
Figure 1: Reuters (2012), ‘Didier Drogba Not About Money in Shanghai Shenhua Club’, Uganda Picks, 17 July 2012, accessed 27 October 2012 at <http://www.ugandapicks.com/2012/07/didier-drogba-not-about-money-in-shanghai-shenhua-club-23148.html>

The gay agenda

24.9.12


“[We] want to be treated like full citizens! Equality. Not special rights, but the rights that we’ve already agreed upon… The gay agenda… Some of you may be calling it the Constitution of the United States” – LZ Granderson (2012)

A few months ago a TEDTalk appeared in my YouTube newsfeed titled “The myth of the gay agenda” by LZ Granderson (2012). “What is the gay agenda?” I thought to myself. I am a straight male, with only limited, second-hand knowledge of the LGBT community. I’m not exactly on the inside of debates such as marriage equality so I was just really interested to find out what the LGBT community actually stands for and what they are still striving for today. Now, after I’ve listened to Kurt Iveson’s lecture “Sexual Citizenship” (2012) and read Michael Warner’s “The Trouble With Normal” (2008), I better understand where Granderson comes from when he talks about citizenship.

Being a citizen is about being entitled to the enjoyment of rights and privileges within society in exchange for the fulfilling of obligations and duties. One important but contested area here is the right to public space. Both Warner and Granderson give prominent examples of discrimination against homosexuals in public space: the zoning laws brought enacted in New York City in 1998 by Rudy Giuliani, the fact that in many US states, people can still be evicted from their home or fired from their job based purely on their sexuality.

However, public space is much more multi-faceted than this. As Iveson puts it, the right to public space also includes the right to be able to act and express one’s self freely in public work spaces, social spaces, and open spaces (Iveson 2012); for your behaviours, practises and activities to be accepted in these spaces. Here, social and cultural factors are the driving forces of discrimination against the LGBT community.

Warner asserts that the gay community are oppressed by the “dominant assumptions” in society “about what goes without saying, what can be said without a breach of decorum” (Warner 2000), they suffer from the normalisation of their sexuality as a source of shame. In his view, the common understanding that the “closet” is “an individual’s lie about him- or herself” is mythology; rather, the “closet” is built around queers by societal norms.

This institutionalised dominance of heterosexuality restricts the gay community’s access to public space in that its members are not able to openly express themselves in public. Iveson gave many examples in his lecture: in work spaces, heterosexuals speak freely about their weekend activities with their spouse and children but homosexuals are not always given this liberty; in social and open spaces, it is common that homosexuals do not feel comfortable expressing their sexuality for fear of being targeted or discriminated against in the form of violence or access to establishments.

I think that Granderson illustrates all of these points in his speech. He talks about constantly hearing the term “gay lifestyle”, reflecting a common view that homosexuals lead a type of “lifestyle” not included in the mainstream. He’s even heard from some politicians that the “gay lifestyle” is “a greater threat to civilisation than terrorism”. “That’s when I got scared”, he jokes, “if I’m gay and if I’m doing something that’s going to destroy civilisation I need to figure out what this stuff is and I need to stop doing this right now”. As long as homosexuality is seen as a different lifestyle, as out of the ordinary, it won’t be included as “acceptable” or “appropriate” for public space and the forms of heteronormative discrimination Iveson talks about will continue.

Later he admits, “I figured if I made it funny, you wouldn’t feel as threatened”, which I think reveals how tentatively a homosexual person has to navigate the heteronormativised world and demonstrates the less obvious ways in which homosexuals’ access to public space is restricted.

Granting homosexuals full access to rights as full citizens is not just a legalistic issue as it starts as a social and cultural one. What I’ve taken out of my exposure to the gay and lesbian movement, is that it’s less about accommodating homosexuality into existing social frameworks of “respectability and mainstream acceptance” (Warner 2000) but recognising them as a different but equal form of “normal” and judging them on their abilities and not on their sexuality. I think only then would the socially normalised forms of discrimination against homosexuals be able to be dealt with. As Granderson puts it, from his daily coffee to the way he raises his son, he wants to be treated like a full citizen.

From the school yard to the beer garden, contest civil liberties

27.8.12

In primary school, the right to a safe environment, it seemed, was always being subordinated at the cost of our civil liberties. This happened even if the troublemakers were a minority group in the school. We had the right to play at lunchtime but if we forgot our school hat, that right was taken away from us. When a Gameboy was stolen, the next day bringing Gameboys to school was forbidden. The same happened with Tamagotchis, Digimons, Pokemon cards and on and on.

The enforcement of such ad hoc and reactionary rules where essentially the entire student body is punished for the misconduct of the minority of troublemakers seems understandable in this context. Primary school is after all full of, well, children, and at that age children are still learning the concept of social responsibility. A further problem is the numerical advantage of students over teachers, which always makes it harder to isolate the troublemakers and deal with them separately.

You may take this as an overly ambitious change of gear but in many ways, I see similarities between the above schoolyard policies and the types of policies that have been recently proposed to tackle the problem of alcohol-fuelled violence in Sydney’s Kings Cross.

If you live in Sydney, it was probably impossible for you to avoid hearing about the death of the 18 year old Tom Kelly on July 7, 2012 in Kings Cross. If not, you can read a bit about it here, here and here. It was a truly tragic incident that has rightly brought violence and alcoholism in the notorious nightspot to the forefront of debate.

After four weeks of studying Cities and Citizenship, I’ve begun to see the situation as a contest 
between different groups who are each calling for greater protection of their rights. Each group comes from a different perspective, has different priorities, different ideologies – and do not consider the rights of the citizen the same way.

NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell has proposed multiple methods to tackle the Kings Cross problem. Taken from the Sydney Morning Herald and the Daily Telegraph:
Shots and doubles should be banned in all licensed venues in Kings Cross on Friday and Saturday nights
  • Glassware should be banned every day of the week
  • “No more than four drinks would be able to be purchased at any one time after midnight”
  • “Wind-down hours” (to “stop serving an hour before closing so patrons do not leave at full tilt”)
  • Creating an outreach patrol to assist intoxicated people call ambulances


The motivation behind such policies is presumably supported by parents groups whose adult age children frequent the area. The rights of the citizen are most often framed in terms of civil, political, and social so, in supporting these types of policies, these groups place social rights (here, the right to public safety) at the top of the scale. In calling for these policies these groups express their belief that, as citizens of Sydney, they should first and foremost be able to enjoy the right to public security.
But the proposed policies do come with the drawback of limiting citizens’ civil freedoms as is reflected in the following Facebook status update:



As a member of the age bracket that generally fills up Kings Cross’s pubs and clubs every week it may not be surprising that I am on the side of the writer of this status update but I feel we do have a point. Perhaps it sounds trivial to those a little more removed, but the “right”, if you will, to enjoy your Friday or Saturday night the way you usually do is important to us and we feel aggrieved that that could potentially be interfered with as a result of actions we did not commit.

Not only does it restrict the civil liberties of the majority because of the actions of a minority, but the policies seem to be aimed at treating the symptoms rather than the causes and this curbs their long-term effectiveness. I feel that regulating the types of drinks available to patrons at bars and restricting the movement of people, for example, would only change the methods revellers will use to access alcohol. 

I also tend to agree with the Australians Hotels Association’s CEO Paul Nicolou who said that “wind-down hours actually create aggression and it loses sight of the fact the problems are not in our venues, they’re on the streets”.

Essentially, I don’t believe that any of the policies listed will change the behaviour, habits, or way of thinking of those who frequent Kings Cross regularly or of the citizens of Sydney generally. Alcoholism is a culture. If it is to be solved, it itself needs to be changed.


28.12.11

24.12.11